|
RoHS Assembly Concerns
Solder Alloy and Flux
Unfortunately, despite a great deal of research, comprehensive and
comparative data on lead-free alloys is lacking. The list of solder
alloy requirements is lengthy and involved. In general, technical
requirements include being non-"hazardous", mechanically
reliable, thermal fatigue resistant, good wetting, relatively low
melt ing temperature and compatible with a variety of lead-bearing
and lead-free surface coatings. In addition, one must consider logistical
issues such as alloy cost, availability and patent issues. While
most of the world has settled on the tin-silver-family of alloys,
a good deal of debate still exists as to which exact composition
is ideal, and of course others will choose alloys from outside of
this family. As with all other technical issues, although there
has been much consortia work on alloy selection, the alloy of choice
will come down to the specific requirements of each unique assembly.
Your choice of alloy is dependent upon your application and should
be proven out to your standards.
As with alloys, what is a suitable flux (paste, liquid flux and
cored wire) for one manufacturer may not be for another. Select
flux chemistries suitable for lead-free processing and your particular
application. One should consider a flux s
activation temperature, activity level, compatibility with chosen
alloy and reliability properties such as SIR, electromigration.
Process Considerations
Once it is confirmed that the parts and materials to
be used in lead-free assembly are available, suitable and reliable,
it is time to get the processes optimized in order to achieve maximum
throughput and reliability. To do so, Engineering must refocus
attention to paste handling, printing, reflow, wave soldering, rework
& repair and cleaning.
Paste Handling
Shelf-lives with lead-free pastes may be reduced as compared
to tin/lead, and storage conditions may be slightly more stringent.
However, in general, the same rules as with tin/lead apply. For
example, prevent/minimize paste's exposure to heat and humidity,
allow paste to come to room temp erature before using and do not
mix old and new paste in the same jar. If one follows proper paste
handling procedures now and has good results from these, there should
be very few issues when transitioning to lead-free paste use.
Printing
In general, no major changes to the printing process
should be necessary. That is, lead-free pastes should exhibit
similar features on the stencil and the same equipment set points
should transition well. One can expect similar performance
in terms of stencil life, aperture release, print definition, high-speed
print capabilities, print repeatability, etc. However, this depends
on the paste manufacturer and if they have density issues resolved.
As tin/lead solder alloys tend to have better wetting than most
lead-free alloys, some stencil design modifications may be needed
to maximize spread of paste and counteract inferior wetting. Engineers
should run tests with lead-free alloys on their current stencils
to confirm adequate spread and wetting. If wetting is not sufficient
and cannot be rectified by other means, stencil design modifications
may be in order.
Reflow
This is the SMT process area that will be most affected
by a switch to lead-free processing. Most lead-free alloys require
higher reflow temperatures than the 210-220 C peak temperature of
tin/lead; anywhere from 235-260 C is common. This higher reflow
temperature dictates that one should minimize T and maximize wetting
through the reflow profile (including cooling), and could possibly
mandate reflow equipment changes.
Profile - Depending upon the oven utilized and the density of the
assembly being processed, the Ramp -to- Spike process is generally
recommended for lead-free assembly.
Wave Soldering
Depending upon the alloy selected, wave soldering will
require a pot temperature of 260-275 C. This increase of temperature
and the change in solder alloy will require some additional process
changes.
Flux- May require a change in liquid fluxes to compensate for the
poor wetting of some alloys and high thermal stresses of the wave
process. If changing fluxes, particular attention should be paid
to both to operating window it offers and the material's reliability
characteristics.
Equipment- Most modern wave solder machines can provide the necessary
heat (preheat and wave) for lead-free soldering.
Rework and Repair
Materials - Operators must be re-trained for lead-free
rework, as the lead-free solders do not flow as well as tin/lead.
This could also require stronger cored wire fluxes to be used. As
with any change of flux chemistry, if changing wire solders, particular
attention should be paid to both to operating window it
offers and the material s
reliability characteristics. Some wires often assumed to be safe
to leave uncleaned are actually classified as rosin fully-activated
and could cause field failures.
All rework should use the same lead-free solder alloy as originally
used on the solder joint; different leadfree solder formulations
should not be mixed on the same joint. If more than one alloy is
in use in the production process (i.e., Sn/Ag/Cu for SMT and Sn/Cu
for wave soldering), operators should be trained to use the correct
wire for each part. For this reason alone, it is advisable to use
a single solder alloy for all assembly operations.
Equipment- It is necessary to ensure that the desoldering and soldering
stations are suitable for lead-free processing, i.e. can reach the
necessary temperatures for lead-free soldering. It should be noted
that leadfree soldering can wear out tips at a much higher rate
than tin/lead.
Maintenance
The main challenge for maintenance is the additional
wear and tear that lead-free assembly puts on assembly equipment.
This is especially true of reflow ovens and wave solder machines.
This is the result of the higher melting temperatures at which the
lead-free solders require the equipment to work and the tendency
of the lead-free materials to wear out the materials they come in
direct contact with.
|