|
Engineering & Design
The
switch to lead-free assembly affects virtually all aspects of the
Engineering function. Engineering personnel will have to pay close
attention to design, components, PWBs, solder alloys, fluxes, and
the printing, reflow, wave soldering, rework and cleaning processes
and equipment.
Established PCB-design rules may need to change during the transition
to lead-free soldering. Currently, industry guidelines govern component
lead-pad and land size, track width and spacing, via and through
hole dimensions, and similar factors to ensure manufacturability
and reliability. However, the physical characteristics of
any solder include subtle factors, such as its ductility and elasticity.
In addition, the local heating of component leads and their pads
causes some thermal expansion during operation, which tin-lead solder
accommodates and matches.
In determining design solutions, Design should try to remain with
as many standard parts as possible. This will reduce the unpredictability
encountered with atypical parts. In addition, if the assembly is
designed to have a long life, factor in the reduced moisture resistance
of parts. Furthermore, Design must factor in the higher temperatures
required for connectors.
Material Considerations
The first critical duty is to ensure that the parts to be used will
be compatible and reliable for their particular application. Compatibility
relates to components , PWBs, solder alloy and flux. Reliability
relates to component concerns, which includes such factors as Moisture
Sensitivity Level (MSL) Rating, wetting and tin whiskering.
Component Reliability Concerns
The higher melting temperatures of the lead-free solders that are
coming into use mandate components that can withstand the increased
temperature stresses of the soldering process. Life -test data for
many components at these higher temperatures is less comprehensive
than it is for tin/lead processes. To maximize reliability, Engineering
should start looking now at all critical components, design rules,
fabrication processes, component engineering, and reliability records.
A critical factor in the transition to lead-free assembly is the
MSL rating of components. To date, industry testing has demonstrated
that there is no generic solution for maintaining an IC's MSL with
a higher reflow profile. However, it has been demonstrated that
degradation of MSL may increase with increasing profile dwell above
200 C and that MSL typically degrades by one level for every 5 to
10 C increase of peak reflow temperature. Therefore, all ICs must
be reclassified for lead-free applications and the impact to MSL.
This could result in an increased need to pre-bake parts and more
stringent storage methods.
It should be noted that these different materials have different
wetting characteristics and that Engineering should consider wetting
when specifying components. Engineering also needs to balance the
fact that increased reflow temperatures can improve wetting, but
worsen reliability. In addition, Design should be aware of reduced
solderability on second-side reflow and through-hole processes.
PWBs / PCBs
Several PWB lead-free surface finish options exist. Many of
these, such as OSPs and Au/Ni immersion, have been available for
years. Engineering should determine the finish of choice based upon
wetting, storage, planarity and cost issues. In addition, it must
be ensured that board materials can withstand reflow temperatures
without warpage or other damage. For many cases, FR-4 will remain
acceptable, but other applications may require a modification.
|